Engineered in, not bolted on.
SAST, DAST, SCA, and infrastructure-as-code security gates run as control-as-code in the pipeline, so security ships with the build.
DevSecOps & Secure-by-Design
Secure-by-design means the pipeline enforces the control, not a reviewer at the end of the quarter. Pueo embeds static, dynamic, and composition analysis alongside infrastructure-as-code checks in CI/CD, where a failing control stops a build instead of surfacing months later as a finding.
The gates are written as control-as-code: each check names the control it satisfies, and the pipeline run is the evidence. That turns delivery telemetry into authorization evidence, so much of what a package needs becomes a by-product of shipping software rather than a separate documentation campaign.
The intent is engineering, not gatekeeping. Thresholds are set with the program so gates block what is genuinely dangerous and route the rest to a queue with an owner, and infrastructure-as-code review keeps the environment a build produces as governed as the code that runs on it. The same discipline applies on classified fabrics, where a pipeline is often the only practical way to keep controls enforced at delivery speed.
What’s Inside
Static analysis in the pipeline (SAST)
Source-level analysis wired into the build with tuned rule sets and an owned triage path, so real defects are fixed in the branch that created them and noise does not train developers to ignore the gate.
Dynamic and API testing (DAST)
Running-application and interface testing against deployed builds, catching the exposure that only appears once the service is up and configured.
Dependency and component analysis (SCA)
Third-party and open-source components inventoried and screened for known risk and license exposure, with policy applied at the point a dependency enters the build.
Infrastructure-as-code security gates
Templates and deployment definitions checked before they provision anything, so hardening and boundary decisions are reviewed as code rather than corrected in production.
Control-as-code evidence
Each gate mapped to the control it satisfies, so pipeline output becomes reusable authorization evidence instead of a screenshot folder assembled at assessment time.
Outcomes
- Security failures caught at build time, not at assessment time.
- Pipeline runs that double as control evidence.
- Infrastructure held to the same gates as application code.
- Fewer late-cycle findings and less remediation rework.
- Delivery speed preserved, with controls enforced in line.
Where this connects.
Speak with an Expert
The hardest networks are the ones Pueo was built for. Tell us what you have to protect.
Contact