Collect once. Answer many frameworks.
Agent-authored compliance-as-code, in development to produce CMMC, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 artifacts from one matrixed control library and a single evidence body.
Multi-Framework Compliance Automation
Most organizations prove the same control several times over, once per framework, in a different format each time. This capability attacks that duplication directly: one matrixed control library, one body of evidence, and framework-specific artifacts generated from both.
It is deliberately described as deployable rather than delivered. The compliance-as-code pipeline is in development and is being dogfooded on Pueo’s own tenant first: Pueo is the first system it has to survive. It has not been run on a federal contract, and nothing here should be read as a customer deployment record.
The design goal is that a control assessed once satisfies its mapped requirement in CMMC, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 without a second collection pass, with agents authoring each framework’s narrative from the shared evidence. The same pipeline is being built with continuous ATO (cATO) and FedRAMP evidence needs in view, again as a deployable capability under development rather than a track record.
What’s Inside
One matrixed control library
A single control set crosswalked to each target framework, so a requirement is written once and mapped, rather than restated in every audit’s dialect.
One evidence body
Evidence collected and held once, then reused by every framework mapped to it. Removing the duplicate collection pass is the point of the design.
Agent-authored compliance-as-code
Framework artifacts authored from the shared library and evidence as code, in development, so regeneration follows the environment instead of a document cycle.
Dogfooded on Pueo’s own tenant
The pipeline is being exercised against Pueo’s own environment before it is offered into any customer boundary. That is also how its gaps get found and closed.
Built with cATO and FedRAMP in view
The same evidence pipeline is being shaped for continuous ATO and FedRAMP evidence needs: deployable capability under development, not a fielded record.
Outcomes
- Designed so one assessed control answers its mapped requirement across several frameworks.
- Intended to remove the duplicate evidence-collection pass between audits.
- Built to regenerate artifacts from current evidence rather than rewrite them each cycle.
- Exercised first on Pueo’s own tenant, before any customer environment.
- Offered as a deployable capability in development, with its maturity stated plainly.
Where this connects.
Speak with an Expert
The hardest networks are the ones Pueo was built for. Tell us what you have to protect.
Contact